Abstract

It is a classical fact that low-lying horocycles equidistribute in the modular curve. Going a step further, one can consider shifted pairs of low-lying horocycles and ask whether they equidistribute simultaneously. This question was recently addressed by Blomer and Michel using a beautiful mix of tools from number theory and dynamical systems. In this talk, I will explain the work of Blomer and Michel and discuss some extensions thereof.

Introduction

We look at with quotiented out. (The hyperbolic plane?)

Low lying horocycles (parallel to the axis) are well studied. We look at the Fundamentalbereich of .

Question: Do low-lying horocycles localize or spread out over the fundamental domain?

On a low-lying horocycle we pick points with a (hyperbolical?) distance of . As goes to infinity goes to something about the volume. (Whatever we pick, I think)

A nice paper proving this is Burnn-Shapira-Yu 2022.

We do some stuff I missed.

We move to a simultaneous equidistant problem. We define a set dependet on which is a collection of pairs with both parts sitting in . The question is, does this equidistribute and how does it look like?

We can define a lattice based on and , then we take the minimum of two points in the lattice. This minimum then gives us a condition for when the points are equidistant. Einsiedler-Lindenstauss-Michaael 2018 already gave some examples for equidistribution. A continuous version of this result was given by Burris.

The last part of the talk gave the proof for this. I honestly couldn’t care to listen.

About