Abstract

Talk

The Euler class associates a homology to a homeomorphism

1. Group cohomology - classifying space model

There are many different ways of defining group cohomology. We’ll be using classifying spaces.

We construct this space as follows: Let the group elements be the vertices. We fill in higher simplices by relations. The result is a space whose first fundamental group is the group.

We next define chains as the set of maps which fulfill . We define a coboundary map which sends to . The quotient of kernel and image gives of the -th cohomology. The bar-cohomology removes one dimension in exchange for a more complicated coboundary map. The coboundary maps in the first cohomology however looks like a Quasimorphism.

Example

The first cohomology is equal to the Homeomorphisms

Let an abelian group like or .

Example

The second cohomology parametrises the extensions of the group. We eloborate: A central extension is a short exact sequence where lies in the Zentrum (Gruppe) of . If there is a homormophism with , then the sequence splits and is a direct product of and .

We care about all of this, because we will do an extension of a circle group later on.

Example

We show that the second cohomology by showing that there is not central extension.

Where did you learn this style of talk?

2. Euler-class of a group acting on a circle

\newcommand{\H}{\text{Homeo}_{+}(S^{1})} There is a central extension You can now take some subgroup embedded. The embedding defines something called the euler cohomology.

We go over to more fundamental group stuff. Let be a closed, orientable surface of genus . Then its fundamental group has a presentation given by

Theorem

The euler class (defined earlier but I didn’t get how) is a quasimorphism.

Theorem (Wilnor-wood inequality)

For any the bounded Euler class is bounded by

Welche Vorlesung war am wichtigsten, um mit dem ganzen mitzikommen?